HomeMagazineListingsUpdateLinksContexts





Royal Ballet

‘Love’s Fool’,
‘My Brother, My Sisters’,
‘Fearful Symmetries’

July 1999
London, Sadler's Wells

by Lynette Halewood


Love's Fool reviews

My Brother reviews

Fearful Symmetries reviews




The first of the triple bills in the Royal’s run at Sadler’s featured a revival of a MacMillan work, a return of Ashley Page’s Fearful Symmetries, and a London appearance for some of the works made for the Dance Bites tour earlier this year. I saw the final performance of the programme on 13 July: this featured Tuckett’s Love’s Fool rather than Baldwin’s Towards Poetry as the opening work.

Love’s Fool is a light hearted, rather insubstantial piece which injects a note of levity into an otherwise rather dark programme. Its subject is an office romance, where the shy office manager (Christopher Saunders) is urged to declare his affections for one of his staff (Yanowsky) by an odd visitor who only he can see (Luke Heydon in an ill fitting clown’s costume), all the while under scrutiny by the office staff (a corps of six). It’s pleasant enough and springs no great surprises. In fact the mysterious stranger facilitating a romance seemed rather similar to the guardian angel idea in AMP’s Cinderella.

My Brother, My Sisters was a much nastier experience: possibly not nasty enough, though. It seems to have been made by Macmillan in one of his more sadistic moods. Not only does it portray the most unpleasantly dysfunctional family playing twisted sexual and other games with each other, it puts the dancers through extremely demanding contortions. Leanne Benjamin and Carlos Acosta writhe under, over and around each other: David Pickering is asked to lift two intertwined dancers simultaneously. It was disconcerting stuff, not at all easy to follow (the low levels of lighting made it difficult to distinguish some of the women from each other, but maybe that’s the point: is he with the third or fourth girl now?). Carlos Acosta made all the jumps and lifts look preposterously easy, and partnered with care: but there was nevertheless no sense of threat in his performance. I haven’t seen this work before, but it felt oddly lacking in menace, and the clash between the first and second sisters (Benjamin and Revie, both usually impressive in MacMillan) lacked real tension until the very end.

Fearful Symmetries was made by Ashley Page in 1994, and remains one of the best things he’s done. It’s a solidly constructed piece, tightly fitted to Adam’s music which seems to propel the dancers across the stage. The fifteen dancers throw themselves into it with real ferocity. It’s interesting to see Mukhamedov in a completely abstract work for a change: he still projects a remarkable intensity while zipping across the stage. Shi Ning Liu and Abegglen also looked as if they relished every step. Bull, Galeazzi and Yanowsky were the lead women. It seemed very much a team effort, though rather than a star vehicle.

Sadlers was still surprisingly full, considering that this isn’t the stronger of the Royal’s triple bills, and that there is plenty of competition for dance audiences in London right now. Overall, the Royal’s dancers were looking on good form, and there is lots to look forward to here in the next few weeks.

{top} Home Magazine Listings Update Links Contexts
...aug99/lh_rev_rb_0799.htm revised: 11th July 1999
Bruce Marriott email, © all rights reserved, all wrongs denied. credits
written by Lynette Halewood © email design by RED56