![]() |
![]() October 2006 by John Mallinson |
||||||||
In the summer of 2003 St Petersburg had a heat wave and was in celebratory mode. This was the 300th anniversary of the founding of the city and a series of grand events encompassed everything from hairdressing competitions and a convention of Russian psychologists, to performances by visiting orchestras and ballet companies including the Royal Ballet, Hamburg Ballet and New York City Ballet. 2003 was also the 20th anniversary of Balanchine's death. He had first taken his company to Russia in 1962 and then again 10 years later. After a gap of 30 years it seemed timely and appropriate for NYCB to bring Balanchine back to Russia, and Bringing Balanchine Back is the title of the film about the visit which is soon to be broadcast on British television. A shortened version was on American TV earlier this year and various US screenings have shown it at its full 80 minutes.
The documentary shows the week long trip from departure to return with quite extensive coverage of the performances and film of the company relaxing. Some of the out-and-about St Petersburg footage is stagey but the director is sure footed when it comes to the filming backstage in the theatre and in performance. Arts documentaries will always frustrate aficionados by dangling snippets of performance. Thus we see the seven minute version of Serenade and three to four minute extracts from others ballets including Balanchine's Symphony in C, Symphony in Three Movements, Western Symphony and Agon, Jerome Robbins's Dances at a Gathering and Glass Pieces, and Peter Martins' Hallelujah Junction. Overall the balance between on-stage and off-stage footage is right for this type of feature, but how one wishes that full versions of some of the performances would be released. Unlikely, but at least they should end up in the Balanchine or NYCB archives.
![]() © Paul Kolnik
With such a large cast to hand there's always a risk of overbalancing a documentary by focussing too heavily on individuals. In this case the director's attention to Alexandra Ansanelli almost does this. Ansanelli, here not at her most natural in front of the camera, had a difficult trip. She was due to premiere in Serenade in St Petersburg but injury had stopped her rehearsing before leaving New York. By the day of her performance she had not danced it with the full company let alone on stage. There followed a very strained rehearsal with Peter Martins. She did not dance that day. This must have been a low moment for her and it is here shown in embarrassing fly-on-the-wall manner, presumably with her concurrence. She finally made a successful Russian debut in Western Symphony.
An effusive Lincoln Kirstein wrote of Balanchine's first visit "His return to his early youth has been touching in the extreme and historic in Terpsichorean annals." There was also much emotion surrounding this 2003 visit. The 20 years since Balanchine's death vanished; the dancers seemed to feel his presence and performed for him. Rosemary Dunleavy-Maslow was especially moved: "When I stood in the wings it all flooded in, everything that we always got from dancing and being with him and part of his world … and being able to carry that on and to bring it back here and to say 'You see, we didn't forget'."
![]() © Paul Kolnik
Overall it seems to have been a very successful trip. The vox pops were favourable, with one man commenting "When you see the real thing … there is no comparison, it's wonderful." Others: "We didn't expect this from the Americans." "It's the best thing that has happened this summer. It's fantastic."
This is a decently-made film which gives an entertaining and interesting view of the atmosphere and the problems and triumphs of the visit.
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||