![]() |
![]() March 2006 New York, Brooklyn Center for the Performing Arts by Eric Taub |
||||||||
After what can only be called the Subway Trip from Hell (thank God we allowed ourselves an hour and a half to reach the end of the Number 2 line), Bruce Marriott and I arrived at Brooklyn College's Walt Whitman Hall barely panting at all from our last-minute sprint across Flatbush Avenue. It was the occasion of a rare visit to New York by the Atlanta Ballet, and also the first performance look New Yorkers would be getting of the work of Christopher Hampson, his Sinfonietta Giocosa. Even had the trains run on time (I'll never again regale Bruce with the glories of the New York City transit system!), I'd still have been a bit anxious, as Hampson is a regular writer here at Ballet.co, and Bruce represents him in some manner (hence the flying visit to New York). Moreover, while possessed of an excellent reputation, Atlanta Ballet is still a small (seventeen dancers, four apprentices) regional company venturing into New York's major-league dance world, and Constant Readers will recall how painful I've found past visits by such companies whose earnest ambitions have far outstripped their abilities. What if I hated Atlanta Ballet, or Hampson's work? Could I ever show my face (metaphorically) at Ballet.co again?
Actually, I could. Bruce was quite scrupulous about assuring me he entirely expected me to make up my own mind about Hampson's piece. But his assurances quickly proved moot. I liked Sinfonietta Giocosa, and Atlanta Ballet isn't awful; in fact, it's pretty darn good, and well worth the tsuris and agita of our subway odyssey.
![]() © Charlie McCullers
Next was the world premiere of Chicago choreograper Lauri Stallings' Shoo Pah Minor, set to bubbly bits of Vivaldi. Stallings' delightfully hyperbolic program notes promised, among other things, "Each movement is a progression and a digression, dualing the dichotomies of athleticism vs. grace, ugly vs. beautiful, one vs. many." (I'll forgive her for writing like a choreographer if the world will forgive me for dancing like a writer.) These dualing dualities appeared in the personages of fourteen dancers dressed in bright, bright green outfits by Elena Rao which invited, no, demanded comparisons to Stephen Galloway's celebrated costumes for William Forstythe's The Vertiginous Thrill of Exactitude. Unflattering comparisons for Rao's designs, which, while featuring rather harmless unitards for the men, put the women in tutus with ultra-flat plates like the rings of Saturn, with big, separate green pants allowing for the occasional flash of a bare midriff in lifts and poses. Rao also saw fit to embellish these designs with unfortunate cutouts covered with coarse green mesh in a crescent under each dancer's right breast, or cut like a shark-bite out of their buttocks. We know we're not in ballet-land as perky women spend so much time crushing their tutus against the big, hunky men, or crouching and flipping them over so we have plenty of time to contemplate the shape and meaning of those shark-bite cutouts. It's a bit unfortunate for Stallings' work that Rao's costumes screamed "Forsythe manqué," as it became near-impossible not to see Rao's work as "Forsythe-lite," at least when one wasn't nostalgically engaging in that old parlor game of "rename the Forsythe ballet," but this time reworking Vertiginous' title to apply to Stallings' work. I gave up after "The Diaphanous Veil of Bad Attitude." (I never was much good at that game, which was pretty much retired by the late Anita Finkel's untoppable "Under the Table, Somewhat Inebriated." But I digress.) Indeed, much like Forsythe, Stallings will offset a balletic stretched and pointed line with "non-dance" movement, but Forsythe has the knack (when he's not tiresome in his pedantry) of showing us walking or posing in a deep penchée as simply extremes of the continuum of movement made real for us by those magnificent creatures, ballet dancers. True to her word, Stalling does indeed set up dichotomies between when her dancers are being dancers they point, stretch, balance with the best of them and when they're not they jump, trip, tumble, writhe over each other, and even (horror of horrors!) sickle their feet. This seems very much a false dichotomy to me, but might've appeared less so had Stallings' vocabulary, particularly when she's tossing in her meager ballet steps, been more, well, interesting. I suppose it's a stretch to say such a plotless, pure-movement piece could reek of condescension, yet Shoo Pah Minor did, seeming more contrived as it progressed, and, in the end, doing no favors to either of the extremes it purported to represent. Here, the dancers gave far more to the choreography than it gave them; and it did nicely show them off as friendly athletes. Last was Hampson's Sinfonietta Giocosa, to Bohuslav Martinu's eponymous, bubbly composition. Hampson's made a dazzling, faceted jewel for twelve of Atlanta Ballet's dancers, and Bruce French's costumes black unitards with delicate lighter tracings for the men; similarly adorned leotards, sheer black tights and shoes for the women, topped with enormous, shining, crystal-studded chokers and earrings echo the wry balance between frippery and formality in Hampson's choreography, which morphs happily between diamond and rhinestone.
The curtain rose on what would become a familiar composition: all twelve men and women facing us in two rows, men to the left, women to the right, in nice, tight fifth positions. Throughout Sinfonietta Giocosa, Hampson returns to this pose, after each section, and at the curtain. They don't hold this, or any, pose for long; like the preceding two ballets, this one is about almost-perpetual, hard-charging movement, which seems to be a hallmark of this company. Hampson puts his dozen through barrages of fast footwork with incessant changes of direction, and tricky jumps both large and small, especially for the ebullient men. Why do a chassé when you can do a chassé en tournant?
![]() © Charlie McCullers
Hampson's referred to Sinfonietta Giocosa as a "3-D jigsaw puzzle." I'm not sure what he means by that; I did notice that he's fond of deploying his dancers in big lines, both up and across the stage, and in diagonals. He plays with a the "funhouse-mirror" effect having his dancers fly across the stage in a perfect line stretching away from us upstage, we see, not individual dancers, but seemingly endless reflections, thanks to the Atlanta dancers admirable unity. Hampson also plays with movement rippling up or down a diagonal line of dancers, like the Wilis in Giselle or the huge line of girls in white in Balanchine's Symphony in Three Movements. Hampson masses his lines of dancers with a disarmingly simple sophistication, a kinetic counterpoint to the individuals he pulls from the group and plays against it.
At the end, Sinfonietta Giocosa seemed as much a flute of champagne as it did jewelry sparkling, effervescent, and with a delicate aftertaste. It speaks well of Hampson's acuity and judgment, although only hinting at how he might handle larger, more-symphonic works, or smaller, more dramatic ones. I do want to see more of his work, and more of Atlanta Ballet, which deserves a longer New York season in a more accessible venue.
![]() © Charlie McCullers
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||