![]() |
![]() A film featuring Chicago's Joffrey Ballet London and cinemas worldwide by Philip Bichard |
||||||||
A movie about dance that is directed by, and starring, Hollywood household names is an uncommon occurance. That the dance in question is not breakdancing, ballroom or hip-hop, but rather ballet - at least ostensibly - makes it a genuine rarity and one would expect dance lovers to approach it with positive prejudices for this reason alone. There is no plot as such, but over a period of some weeks we get to go inside Chicago's Joffrey Ballet and voyeuristically follow various threads, both professional and personal. Shot with digital video the style is a cross between a "fly-on-the-wall" documentary with it's uneven production values and shaky picture, and a traditional high-end Hollywood movie with its unrealistic perfection. The pioneering technique means that the viewer is taken into places not normally possible, at its best giving us an intimate and revealing insight, at its worst falling between stools. This hybrid "movie-mentary" style produces a movie that can be difficult to grasp on to. Were we supposed to hear that sly comment in the background from a minor character or was that just color? Am I supposed to care about any of these people or am I expected to be just an dispassionate observer? Is this movie going anywhere or is it just about the view?
This isn't a film about star leads, but there are two main characters who we see more than the others - upcoming dancer Ry, played by Scream's Neve Campbell, and Artistic Director Mr. A, played by Malcolm McDowell. Some billing prominence is given to Ry's new boyfriend, a chef called Josh (James Franco) but this character is not developed at all and remains on the periphery of our attention. In a small scene typical of the whole film, she politely chastises her ex-boyfriend, a fellow company member, since apparently the rest of the company knew he had moved on to pastures new before she did. Such is a private life in the ranks of a dance company.
![]() Neve Campbell and Malcom McDowell arguing... © The Company
One can see the film appealing mainly to non-hardcore dance fans, those people who don't already know what goes on in locker rooms and the rehearsal studio. The general public who take a chance may well find all that fascinating and hopefully their interest in seeing live dance is increased. That is to be hoped. Moviegoers who look beyond the daily coming and goings, perhaps on a second viewing, may find the dispassionate style, lack of plot momentum and flat characters a little dull. The main problem with the movie is with the dance itself, which is a fairly large flaw for a movie about dance. The film opens with some kind of crass ribbon number with the opening credits laid over it. This shows immediately that this is not going to be a film about classical ballet. Indeed this, and many of the other prop-laden "ballets", would have been more comfortably performed by the Cirque du Soleil. One concept in a particularly silly new work was described, with a straight face like so: "Zebras come out of the snake's mouth. They are in black and white to represent 'the dualist nature of our existence.'" Oh please.
There are 10 "ballets" shown, to a greater or lesser extent. Some are only on screen for less than a minute, another is followed from the hiring of the choreographer, through rehearsals and cast changes, to the opening night itself. However, dance fans may have wished for less breadth and more depth, with more time given over to explore the actual dance itself. When dance was on screen the camera often missed the dancers, leaving you to wonder if the director was rushed or under-prepared. Perhaps he was just being deliberately artful - but the audience might have benefited from seeing the dance unfold without being distracted by pop video editing, wild camera angles and constant disorienting changes of position.
![]() © The Company
Overall, a canape buffet of a movie - you had to make the effort to feed yourself, only to then realise the fare was insubstantial. A missed opportunity to show the glory of dance - or at least more of the blood, sweat and tears.
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||