HomeMagazineListingsUpdateLinksContexts





Kirov Ballet

‘4th Int'l Ballet Festival Mariinsky:'
,'Steptext',
‘Vertiginous Thrill of Exactitude’, ‘In the Middle Somewhat Elevated’, ‘Swan Lake’, ‘La Bayadere’, ‘Prodigal Son’, ‘The Rite of Spring’, ‘Don Quixote’, ‘and others’

March 2004
St. Petersburg, Mariinsky Theatre

by Baletoman

'Bayadere' reviews

'Prodigal Son' reviews

'Rite of Spring' reviews

'Les Noces' reviews

Vishneva in reviews

Lopatkina in reviews

recent Kirov reviews

more Baletoman reviews

Discuss this review
(Open for at least 6 months)




As posted on our Postings pages...

Here are some of my impressions from the Mariinsky festival. Sorry for the length, but there were so many interesting performances that I can't avoid writing about them.

Forsythe. The Company performed 3 ballets: Steptext, The Vertiginous Thrill of Exactitude and In the Middle Somewhat Elevated. All ballets are classic, on pointes, with minimal costumes and almost no decoration, accompanied by recorded music. The choreography is abstract and seemed very difficult - it demands strong technique and exactness.

1. Steptext
3 male dancers and a lady. The music is Ciaccona from Partita No2 by J.S. Bach.
The curtain rises, the light is still on. The only decoration is an abstract painting somewhere in the middle of the stage - cut black lines on the white. There is a dancer in black (standing to the left wing curtains, close to the audience) who starts his solo (not dancant, just movements of arms). Then a sudden and short sound of ciaccona breaks the silence. The dancer finishes his solo and disappears behind the painting. Another dancer comes out from there and everything repeats. Then, as far as I remember... the third dancer. And finally a lady fully in red comes out from the right. The music sounds. During the ballet the lady has duet dances with all three male dancers in turn, while often the other two male dancers are dancing together. The whole choreography is not dancant, there is much gymnastics and supports in duets. Sometimes the music stops suddenly and the dancers stop as well, as if they have been rehearsing something and are having a break now, they go off stage. Sometimes they "speak" to each other by means of special system of gestures created by Forsythe and one could feel whether they "are having an argument" or just "exchanging their views". Due to the blackness of the stage and curtains and the presence of this abstract painting which, as it seemed to me, made the space three dimensional, I had an impression as if the dancers had been in a room but sometimes they disappeared to some other space (that we can't see) and appeared from nowhere. And it seemed that the heroes themselves sometimes acted as if they had not understood from where the others appear and where they disappear. Sometimes the light was on. Interesting.

I saw 2 casts: Natalia Sologub, Andrey Merkuriev, Fiodor Murashov and Andrey Ivanov (7/03) and Diana Vishneva, Igor Kolb, Mikhail Lobukhin and Maxim Khrebtov (gala 14/03). All danced very well. I liked both casts with a little bit more preference to the second which I found a little bit more exact and corresponding. Though Sologub looked better in that costume - she has more prolonged lines than Vishneva. And in particular I was impressed by Kolb.

2. The Vertiginous Thrill of Exactitude
2 male dancers and 3 ladies. The music: 9 Symphony by Schubert.
Ugliest costumes: for male dancers - red short tights and a shirt fit close to the body (altogether it is one piece, but I don't know the name of such a costume, a kind of tricot), the back being bare; for ladies - some yellowish - ochre tutus, the skirts being a kind of cardboard circle (a well-spread and ugly modern variant of a tutu) and the pants being black. Altogether, the guys looked sexless and the girls - disfigured. The choreography seems to imply much dancing and correspondence of group dances. I saw Sarafanov, Fadeev, Zhelonkina, Tkachenko and someone else (I could not see exactly who it was, Ivanova or Gonchar). Sarafanov was a little bit reckless and fell at one moment. Fadeev was superb. Zhelonkina was super classical. Tkachenko has very strong technique. All group dancing lacked correspondence, to my mind. Though I liked the ballet itself. It allows the artists to show off and may be a delight when everything is 100% coordinated.

3. In the Middle Somewhat Elevated
I liked it more than other 2 ballets. It implies 3 boys and 6 girls. The music is something electronic but suits the ballet very well. The choreography demands very strong technique, much coordination, solos, duet dances. I saw the cast for 7/03, including Irina Golub, Tatiana Tkachenko, Mikhail Lobukhin, Anton Pimonov, Yekaterina Kondaurova, Evguenia Obraztsova, Ti Yen Ru, Yana Serebriakova and others. The performance was striking, especially the parts with Tkachenko, Golub and Lobukhin! Superbly done! All danced very well and 100% coordinated. No wonder that they received a very warm reception from the audience, with many bravos! I also liked the costumes, especially those for girls - a green suit with black transparent tights on it. I found them attracting and emphasising the beauty of the dancers.

As a whole, I liked the ballets the company acquired. They have some interesting choreography which is graphic, dynamic, with many duets, supports and poses, interesting group graphics. In particular, I was impressed by one moment when the music was dying down, while the dancers were dancing from the centre to the curtains in all directions by means of fouette movements, which brilliantly corresponded to the fading character of the music. Though the choreography is abstract, it has its mood. It is quite sharp, not romantic. A typical Forsythe girl in these ballets is quite aggressive and self-confident, a guy is neither a noble gentleman nor romantic or knight, but either a sexless showing off character or a modern man treating his self-confident girl equally. But the most important and pleasant to me was that the Mariinsky dancers were so good at this difficult choreography: exact, musical, technical, super plastic and beautiful. My first and main impression from Forsythe's ballets was how gorgeous the dancers are!


Swan Lake (6/03)
Ivanov-Petipa/Tchaikovsky

Jose Martinez had to dance Prince Siegfried, but he did not come. I did not miss him at all because the whole performance was very successful. Korsuntsev was nice and Uliana Lopatkina was outstanding! It is useless to describe her dancing. I'll just say that she was great every moment, very precise, with many nuances, musical and beautiful! Wonderful fouettes in the 3 scene (taking in consideration her injured leg), followed by an ovation! Korsuntsev was an admirable Siegfried this time with brilliant noiseless jetes in his variation in 3 scene. Though during the performance the audience did not give him the reception he deserved. I felt pity! He deserved much better reaction! He is a wonderful dancer and a reliable partner! They did not applaud even on his entrance in 1 scene! Awful, terribly impolite and against traditions of meeting the principals! As if the public had only consisted of tourists!!! Even Ilya Kuznetsov (von Rothbart) was met by applauses in 2 scene! Kuznetsov captured the audience by his expressiveness and jumps. Andrey Ivanov (Jester) was a virtuoso as always. Pas de trois in 1 scene was well danced by Irina Zhelonkina, Irina Golub and Vassily Shcherbakov. Though I would not say that any of them impressed me much. Moreover, I wish they had had more coordination - Vassily's jumps are higher and longer. I think he has to be more reserved and to show off less in this pas de trois, as it requires harmony among the three dancers. Cygnets -Obraztsova, Svetlana Ivanova, Yana Selina, Elena Vasiukovich - good. Big swans: Viktoria Terioshkina, Yana Serebriakova, Yekaterina Kondaurova, Alina Somova - it may have been better if there was more coordination. Two swans: Gonchar and Sukhorukova - I can't understand the choice of the management as both girls seem to have not very plastic arms. The Spanish dance was brilliantly danced by Ti Yen Ru, Natalia Tsyplakova, Islom Baimuradov and Andrey Yakovlev (1st). Neapolitan dance: Obraztsova, Khrebtov. Hungarian dance: Polina Rassadina, Artiom Yachmennikov. Mazurka: Rakhmanova, Iosifidi, Kondaurova, Papava, Igor Nikitin, Fiodor Lopukhov, Kulaev, Dmirtri Sharapov.

A special pleasure was to hear the orchestra under the baton of Boris Gruzin. And, of course, to see gorgeous costumes by Galina Soloviova and my favourite decorations by Igor Ivanov.


Chopinianas (8/03 and 9/03)
Fokin/Chopin
Irina Zhelonkina (Mazurka)
Yana Selina (Waltz N11)
Daria Sukhorukova (Prelude)
Evgueny Ivanchenko (Poet) (8/03)
Igor Kolb (Poet) (9/03)

Irina Zhelonkina was light, precise and classic! I always like to see her dancing. I like more and more Yana Selina - a very beautiful and admirable dance; moreover, she seems to have good technique and artistry. Ivanchenko was a nice poet and not as heavy as always. But I liked Kolb more - he is lighter and more precise. Igor has his interpretation of the role: his Poet is mesmerised by the Sylphs, every time they escape from him he seems to wake up and jerkily or passionately tries to catch them again not to let them go. I think not all can agree with such passion in Poet, but at the same time Igor's Poet seems more live and romantic, which I liked.


Prodigal Son (8/03)
Balanchine/Prokofiev
Prodigal Son - Mikhail Lobukhin
Siren - Yulia Makhalina
Friends - Dmitri Pykhachov, Mxim Khrebtov

Wonderful performance! First of all, due to Mikhail Lobukhin, a handsome and expressive blond dancer with beautiful body and strong technique! He brilliantly danced and acted, especially I liked the last part - very dramatic! He impressed me immensely! Yulia Makhalina was powerful and fatal Siren. The whole company did very well!


The Rite of Spring (9/03)
Nizhinsky - M.Hodson/Stravinsky
Chosen One - Alexandra Iosifidi
Conductor - Mikhail Agrest

Another pleasant performance! The company is dancing it better now, but still, it needs more time, I think. One can still see that the dancers have difficulties with movements and the order. Iosifidi was very good in the last part (I liked her more than Makhalina), but the pose in which the Chosen girl stays frozen from fear for a long period before starting her dance seemed to me a little bit different from what it had to be. It had to be more precise and to transform the terror the Chosen girl feels. This time the impression was diluted. A special pleasure was to listen to the genius music played by the orchestra. Unfortunately, the audience was reserved in reception of this ballet.


Les Noces (9/03)
Nizhinska/Stravisnky

The performance was a disappointment due to lack in coordination in the corps! They have to rehearse it again and again! It is a shame to dance this genius ballet in this way! No wonder the public did not give it a warm reception.


Etudes (9/03)
Lander/Czerny
Andrian Fadeev, Leonid Sarafanov, Viktoria Terioshkina (debut)

Andrian Fadeev was handsome, exact, technical and classical. Sarafanov looked fresher and a little bit lighter, though not as classical as Andrian. Terioshkina danced strongly for debut. I liked her. Though there were mistakes. The corps lacked a little bit in coordination (the girls) in the beginning, but by the end all were impressing. Tatiana Tkachenko was noticeable by her technique and confidence. Yana Serebriakova had some problems with tours. But overall, I admire how the Mariinsky dance this ballet. It is a great chance for them to show off their technique and beauty of lines and poses. And it is such joy for the audience!!!


Manon (10/03)
MacMillan/Massenet
Manon Lescaut - Natalia Sologub
De Grieux - Roberto Bolle
Lescaut - Maxim Khrebtov
Lescaut's Mistress - Tatiana Tkachenko

I was very glad that I attended the performance. In my view, the duet Roberto Bolle- Natalia Sologub brilliantly worked out!!! Bolle was noble, accurate, strong and reliable. During supports, every time Natalia was passed from hands of the Mariinsky dancers to his hands I breathed a sigh of relief, feeling that now she was safe. Natalia was charming, touching and very attentive to the partner. But what I liked the most was the last scene of the ballet. Natalia was brilliant!!! Fantastic! And Roberto acted very touching! Bravo! They received many bravos at the end!

Another revelation to me was Tatiana Tkachenko as Lescaut's Mistress whose attractive dances were seductive and full of charm but never vulgar! Maxim Khrebtov was very convincing as Lescaut. What a funny duet he had with Tatiana when Lescaut is drunk! Great! As far as I noticed Lescaut is the most dancing character. And Maxim succeeded in all.

Another dancer who stood out was Anton Lukovkin who was the leader of beggars. His dancing in the first scene was light and fresh.

The corps needed rehearsing - there was lack in coordination.

The performance as a whole and the lead dancers were very warmly received. I liked how attentive Natalia and Roberto were to each other. One could see that they liked dancing with each other and that they were very glad that the performance received such a good reaction. I must say I would like to see Roberto Bolle dancing with the Mariinsky once again. Though his technique is different and he is not so light, but he is handsome, tall, strong, reliable, with accurate technique and nice manners. I hope that his successful performance and love by the public will promote another invitation to the Mariinsky.


Sleeping Beauty (11/03)
Petipa/Tchaikovsky
Reconstructed version of the choreography, costumes and decorations
Princess Aurora - Diana Vishneva
Prince Desire - Massimo Murru (La Scala)
Fee des Lilas - Daria Pavlenko
Fee Fleur de Farine - Olesya Novikova
Fee des Canaris - Yana Selina
Fee Candid - Alina Somova
Fairy of little ones - Evguenia Obraztsova
Fee Violente - Elvira Tarassova
The King - Vladimir Ponomariov
The Queen - Elena Bazhenova
Carabosse - Igor Petrov
Catalabute - Andrey Yakovlev (1st)
Bluebird - Anton Korsakov
Princess Florine - Irina Zhelonkina
Fairy of Silver - Tatiana Tkachenko
Fairy of Brilliants - Yekaterina Osmolkina
Fairy of Gold - ? (could not see)
Fee Saphire - ? (could not see)
White Cat - Yana Selina
Cat - Anton Lukovkin
Prince Fortune - Salikov
Prince Cheri - Kurkov
Prince Charmant - Baranov
Prince Fleur de poi (?) - Bobovnikov
Red cap - Elena Vasiukovich
The corps of the Mariinsky and students of the Vaganova Academy of Russian Ballet
Conductor - Boris Gruzin

It is the most fundamental of all ballets. Gorgeous decorations and costumes, genius music, great choreography, promising cast... Wonderful performance!

Diana Vishneva was from top to toe the Princess. I liked her interpretation. I think it corresponds to the sense of the ballet. She was the most shining and beautiful princess of all princesses in the world. Her appearance on the stage was an event. She was impeccable! Her every variation was accompanied by bravos.

Massimo Murru appeared only in the 3 Act and had not danced until the end of the Act 4. Actually, we did not see much of his dancing as he really danced only in the final pdd. There he was nice and accurate, but not particularly impressive. May be, because he did not have any chance to impress. The style of the final pdd does no allow much showing off. Therefore, it is easier to speak about Murru's interpretation of the role of Desire. I would say that he was not very insisting to see Aurora as his wife. He was too reserved may be. I would like to see more love and persistence in Desire when the Lilac Fairy introduced Aurora to him. During the 3 Act it seemed as if it had been only a happy coincidence that this prince, not another one came to the forest. But the sense is that the Prince deserved Aurora because he was subtle enough to listen to his intuition, sincere in his love to Aurora when he saw her, brave and persistent enough to be able to come to the sleeping forest and loving to be able to understand that his kiss will break the spells. Murru was too reserved and formal.

Daria Pavlenko was a very nice Lilac Fairy, but in my opinion she needs to add a little bit more power to her character. I would like to see Lopatkina in this role. All other fairies were nice, but I would like to see more temperament in every character.

Korsakov was a nice and classic Bluebird. Though I expected more lightness from his jumps. Irina Zhelonkina's Florine was classic and delicate, but Irina does not often give the I also found that her arms in variation audience a chance to see her smile... were not enough plastic. Overall, I had expected more from this pair - bigger amplitude of dance and more temperament.

Apart from Vishneva, the biggest joy was brought by White Cat - Yana Selina and Cat - Anton Lukovkin! There were many children among the audience. Selina was so charming, tender and skittish and her duet with Anton was so funny that children started laughing. This enthusiastic children's laugh caused laugh in adults. So, the character dance ended with lots of smiles and bravos!

As far as dancing is concerned, all danced strongly and very coordinated. The peasants waltz was brilliant! Overall, the level of dance was very high. I did not notice anything wrong. All soloists were very strong.

The costumes and decorations are unique! They impress. But this brightness and chic totally correspond to the sense of the ballet - it must be full of bright colours, joy and happiness. I am so happy they restored the ballet (as well as La Bayadere)!

A treasure was the musical interval when the floor on which the orchestra is situated came up and we could listen to the violin solo accompanied by the orchestra.

A wonderful and very inspiring ballet!



Don Quixote (12/03)
Gorsky-Petipa/Minkus
Basil - Leonid Sarafanov
Kitri - Paloma Herrera (American Ballet Theatre)
Street dancer - Tatiana Tkachenko
Espada - Andrey Merkuriev
Queen of the Dryads - Natalia Sologub
Amur - Evguenia Obraztsova
Mersedes - Galina Rakhmanova
Gypsy dance - Polina Rassadina, Islom Baimuradov
Eastern dance - Tsyplakova
Garmash - Semenov
IV Variation - Kassenkova
2 dancers - Xenia Dubrovina, Yana Serebriakova
Conductor - Boris Grusin
The corps of the Mariinsky theatre and students of the Vaganova Academy of Russian ballet.

For me it was the most joyous ballet of the festival. First of all, there were two characters that were absolutely fantastically danced and acted! It was something incredible! I mean Andrey Merkuriev's Espada and Leonid Sarafanov's Basil! Two great dancers! It was the first time I had seen Merkuriev's Espada. It was something so thrilling! Gorgeous jumps, nuances, passionate temperament! Brilliant! I was told that Merkuriev is famous for this role. For me it was a revelation. There was a long break due to non stopping ovation.

I had seen Leonid Sarafanov before, but every time he lacked either in the stage presence or nuances or accuracy or partnering skills. This time he was sparkling and expressive, accurate in everything and a very attentive partner. He made much progress. I wish him all the best!

The brilliant Merkuriev's dance was supported by a young and very promising dancer with whom I fell in love during the Festival - Tatiana Tkachenko - Street dancer. She has very strong technique and is very artistic.

I also liked Paloma Herrera - Kitri. She worried but always tried to do her best and sparkle the audience, for which I am very grateful to her. How sparkling she was in the first Act! In the second act, the classic scene of Don Quixote's dream, she lost "the competition". The Mariinsky dancers won and got better reaction from the public.

Natalia Sologub was especially good as the Queen of Dryads. A tiny Obraztsova seemed admirable as Amur. The last pdd was brilliantly done by Paloma and Leonid. They made a good duet. The public were impressed by Paloma's double fouette. The corps and other soloists danced superbly! Another performance that I can't avoid mentioning was Gypsy dance, especially Baimuradov's dancing. Bravo!

There were many other lovely moments: Sancho Pansa - Anton Lukovkin and how he was tortured at the beginning by street people, wonderful funny Garmash - Semenov, a real white horse and a donkey on the stage, gorgeous decorations of a forest in autumn for the scene of dream, children's theatre... There is so much taste in the ballet! So many nice mis en scene's. So much nice humour. But it is never rude!

As a whole, I was totally absorbed by the performance but the dance of Merkuriev and Sarafanov will stay in my memory as some of the best moments of ballet.


La Bayadere (13/03)
The reconstructed version of the choreography, costumes and decorations, as well as an elephant, a tiger and many parrots (all dead!).
Petipa (variations by Chabukiani and Sergueev)/Minkus
Nikya - Daria Pavlenko
Gamzatti - Elvira Tarassova
Solor- Ithan Stiefel
Shades - Novikova, Tkachenko, Somova
Pas d'action - Tarassova, Pavlenko, Stiefel, Sukhorukova, Serebriakova, Selina, Tkachenko
Indian dance - Rakhamanova, Baimuradov
Manu - Obraztsova
The corps and students of the Vaganova academy of Russian ballet

Though I like this version of the Bayadere more that the Soviet one, I did not like this performance. Pavlenko's dance did not come out well, in my opinion, - she was too sharp and technically inaccurate and not plastic. Though there were very nice moments during the first Act and during the dance with a basket of flowers. Moreover, the duet between her and Stiefel did not work out at all. It was too obvious. I think the dancers felt relief when they were dancing alone. I could not understand why Pavlenko's partner was Stiefel and vice a versa why the management put Pavlenko as a partner to Stiefel. They looked so different. She seemed massive near him. Being short legged, he seemed even smaller near Pavlenko. He had obvious problems with partnering Daria. Naturally, she was nervous about this. But anyway, I don't think it was Dasha's day. The public felt this and the reception was too reserved. I did not like Stiefel either. He was totally spineless and non-expressive Solor, not masculine, not musical and seemed running after ballerina to be at the right place on time. But it is my own opinion because the public's reception was very warm. He captured the audience by his noiseless and high jumps. But I found them too short and short legged. His interpretation was too simplified, the dancing being not very nuanced. But he succeeded in throwing back his head and making expressive movements in the beginning and the end of his variations as other usually do in Le Corsaire. Their duet with Tarassova worked better.

The scene when two ladies argue whom Solor loves lacked in dramatism, in my opinion. Overall, the ballet seemed dead this time.

Galina Rakhmanova and Islom Baimuradov brought life to the ballet during their Indian dance solos. Obraztsova and two Vaganova girls danced the dance of Manu very lovely. The best classic dance came from three shades and, especially, the quartet of soloists in pas d'action. But the audience consisting, perhaps, two thirds of foreign tourists did not even cry out a bravo to them. But the girls were superb, in my opinion! Bravo!

The corps worked quite well, but not brilliantly.

The conductor was Sinkevich.


Gala (14/03)
1. Steptext
Vishneva, Kolb, Lobukhin, Khrebtov
See above.

2. Wedding procession
Yakobson/some Jewish music (I lost my brochure, sorry)
It describes a Jewish wedding, relatives on both parts, a bride and her rich bridegroom whom she hates and her love to the poor Jewish guy. But she was forced to marry the rich one, as far as I understood. The poor one was left to suffer.

Danced by dancers of the Yakobson's theatre "Choreographic miniatures". A short (approx. 10 min) non-classic, dramatic ballet miniature, full of humour, interesting plastic dancing (not difficult, but needs precise characterisation, posing and plasticity) and witty observations expressed in dance, interesting duets and group pictures, good decoration and nice costumes. I found it very original. The audience, being very generous in applauding this evening, reacted reservedly. But the ballet is really unusual and non classical. The dancers performed it very well. There was a quartet of musicians on the stage playing Jewish tunes very well.

3. Divertissement
a) Pdd from Le Corsaire (Petipa/Drigo): Leonid Sarafanov and Paloma Herrera.
Sarafanov - superb! Beautiful, long, airy jumps, noiseless and precise endings, nuanced and plastic movements, very good partnering (he raised Herrera above his head with his arms stretched, stood up on his toes and went as if saying "Look"! Now I can do this without wobbling, though this lady is as big as I am. Herrera was also exact, charming and impressed again with double fouette. Of course, there was a storm of applause!

b) Pdd from Le Quattro Stagioni, L'estate (Summer) (?/Vivaldi): Roberto Bolle and Greta Hodkinson.
A kind of a love duet. I found it not very interesting. Bolle did not have much to dance. Though he was handsome and noble, as always. The lady was good but I was not impressed by her. She is so skinny that makes her body unpleasant and movements not plastic.

c) Stiefel and a Kirov lady (I could not see who it was) danced something American. I am afraid I don't remember the name. Something from Harrison: "...Without you". I found it boring. I did not listen to the words of the song and could not understand the meaning of his movements and his rolling on the floor and hugging the lady. The public definitely liked Stiefel.

d) An abstract from La Petite Mort (Kilian/Mozart?): Aurelie Dupont and Manuel Legris.
I liked it very very much. Not so much dancing, mostly - duet with many supports and poses, but very beautiful! And I liked the dancers very much. I don't know, may be I am prejudiced, but I could feel a very good classical school and style.

e) A duet from In the Middle Somewhat Elevated (Forsythe/ electronic soul): Uliana Lopatkina, Vladimir Shishov.
Gorgeous! Brilliant! Very beautiful lines, expressive, musical, precise and decisive! The longest applauses and bravos followed.

f) Pdd from Excelsior (Manzotti/?): Roberto Bolle and Greta Hodkinson.
The lady was good, with very good fouette, light (I don't know how big the dancer has to be to look heavy in the reliable hands of Bolle). Bolle in pants, almost bare is something special for the female part of the audience! He is not a jumper, but I admired his accurate, precise and noble dancing.

All dancers came out at the end and received many bravos and applauses, especially Sarafanov-Herrera, Bolle-Hodkinson and of course, the longest ovation for the Prima ballerina who proved again that she is unsurpassed!

4. Etudes
Viktoria Terioshkina, Karl Paquette, Andrian Fadeev
I worried about Viktoria, but this time she did everything almost impeccably and with much participation, with soul (even double fouette). A strong dancer with iron-like will! There was only one moment when after many tours in the end of a very difficult solo she relaxed a little bit and finished wobbling (The audience even sighed). But in my opinion, she deserved every bravo she received in the end of the performance. I liked the French dancer very much for his manners, style and wonderful work of legs.

I hope all Grand Opera fans will forgive me but I found that Fadeev looked better: exact movements, accentuated gestures, enthusiasm, beautiful jumps, lightness. The corps looked well, much in unison. But this time the girls worked better than guys (one of them even slipped and fell). I had another chance to observe with admiration fine lines and polished technique of the Mariinsky dancers.


It was the major end of the Festival during which there were disappointments, falls and rises, moments of harmony and greatest joy. But what I appreciate is that not only did some honoured artists of the Mariinsky impress (like Lopatkina, Vishneva, Sologub, Zhelonkina, Kolb, Korsuntsev, Fadeev, Korsakov) but I could also see how many strong dancers there are in the young generation (Sarafanov, Merkuriev, Tkachenko, Selina, Serebriakova, Obraztsova, Somova, Novikova, Lobukhin, Khrebtov). I found it wonderful that they were given a chance to show themselves in different choreography and different character roles during the Festival. And of course, perhaps, the most attracting for many spectators was to see guest dancers dancing with the Mariinsky, to enjoy their temperaments, to compare the styles and to see how some new ballets have to be danced and, perhaps, even to see some new shades in old ballets. I hope this new tradition will live.


{top} Home Magazine Listings Update Links Contexts
...apr04/ba_rev_kirov_0304.htm revised: 20 March 2004
Bruce Marriott email, © all rights reserved, all wrongs denied. credits
written by Baletoman © email design by RED56