 |
Ballet.co Postings
GW
|
03-12-04, 12:51 PM (BST) |
|
1. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella - 2 December 2004"
In response to message #0
| |
Royal Ballet ‘Cinderella’ Royal Opera House- 2 December 2004 A performance dedicated to Dame Alicia Markova CBE (1910 – 2004)
This first night of ‘Cinderella’, the third installment of the Ashton 100 celebrations, was preceded by a brief statement from Monica Mason, sadly announcing the passing of Alicia Markova earlier in the day and dedicating this performance to the Vic-Wells’ original Prima Ballerina. Dame Alicia had been born on the 1st of December and she died on the 2nd, with 94 glorious years in between.
It is one of fate’s gentle ironies that one of the very few Prima Ballerina Assolutas should pass from this world on a day where that evening’s performance in dedication to her should be danced by one of the most prodigious talents of this generation. I would like to excise the words ‘one of’ in the preceding sentence but I’m mindful that Markova was, herself, very ill-at-ease when described as ‘..very possibly the greatest (dancer) that has ever lived’, since she felt that it was much too much to live up to. In any event, I cannot imagine a more fitting ballerina to dance this dedication and Alina did Alicia proud. A year ago, I felt that Alina Cojocaru was almost the perfect Cinderella. I was left with just a few question marks in relation to her performance in the second Act, particularly the emphasis on balance and line in the adagio movements. Her Act I focus on childish innocence rather than downtrodden drudge seemed to me to echo Ashton’s intentions. If anything, the demarcation is now even stronger and it certainly plays to Alina’s strengths. Any reservations I had previously about her Act II performance have been entirely blown away. Her entrance in that famous head-high, downstairs descent on pointe brilliantly and unerringly achieved the immediate princessly-grandeur to contradict her previous life by the kitchen hearth. Alina has always had the mastery of the fast “Pavlova” steps, so beloved by Ashton. She has this skill in common with many other contemporary ballerinas but very few can attack an allegro tempo in the same consistent, apparently effortless and unhurried way. I saw a greater maturity in her magical presence at the Ball: a clarity of balance and line on a par with Yoshida at her best, coupled with a dreamlike manifestation of the fairytale, romantic image. Here is a would-be Princess capable of capturing the heart of the most cynical Prince. Alina has the great fortune to enjoy the synergy of a sensitive and supportive partner and Johan Kobborg was also in excellent form: presenting his ballerina to enable, enhance and enrich her own sparkling performance and attacking his variation and solos with controlled ebullience – he has that special talent to appear to spring that inch or two higher, hang that moment longer and bend that little bit more. Vanessa Palmer replaced the injured Isabel McMeekan as the Fairy Godmother and reprised her excellent performance from last season: I especially enjoyed the delicacy of her bourrées in the final Act and she has the inherent, elegant flexibility that dictates so much of Ashton’s style. There was also a first-class line-up of Fairies and Prince’s friends. Christina Elida Salerno was simply divine as Fairy Spring with an elegance of line and movement (watch out also for Bethany Keating in the second cast since she is perfectly suited to this role) and Laura Morera has a well-deserved monopoly of the pointy, staccato dances, exemplified by Fairy Autumn and the Fairy of Temperament. Lauren Cuthbertson appears to be equally at home as Summer and Winter. My only disappointment amongst the supporting dancers was the rather one-dimensional reading of Marianela Nuñez as the ice fairy but this is perhaps understandable given her wonderful performance as ‘Sylvia’ on the previous night. Is it possible to get a better group of Friends that Harvey, Sasaki, Soares and Watson? I doubt it and I feel sorry for the second cast having to match their near-perfect symmetry in the pas de quatre. As before, the only negative for this ‘Cinderella’ lies in the wholly OTT and vulgar antics of Dowell and Sleep as the Ugly Sisters. It has always seemed to me that Ashton got the balance wrong in that pantomime wins over ballet in terms of the sisters’ antics encroaching too much into the performance. It would be nice to think that this was just the dancer’s ego defeating the choreographer’s sense but since Ashton originally intended women for the parts, we don’t even have this indulgence to blame! There is scope for great humour and parody with the ugly sisters and I don’t, in any way, object to that. Sir Anthony Dowell does more with the dominant ‘Helpmann’ role than Wayne Sleep is able to coax from the ‘Ashton’ sister. The latter often appears to be no more than a precocious child being bullied by a more domineering sibling, whereas others have achieved a more complex interpretation of cunning intentions being constantly thwarted. Whilst these great dancers will rightly continue to draw in the audiences, I suspect that there will be much greater reward in the subtler, comic characterizations of Alastair Marriott and Jonathan Howells. Oh, and please, please somewhere down the line let’s lose the ridiculous Napoleon and Wellington costumes for the two suitors. Why? Is it a fancy dress ball? Surely, the point is just that one is little and one is large? Also, there appears to be absolutely no point to the jester other than as a virtuoso intermission (danced here with gusto by José Martin) and it seems to me that this wasn’t the only point to the part. This Prokoviev score has never been amongst my favourites, although it has some wonderful moments, not least in complementing the fairytale ending. It was once described to me as “stepping into a warm bath” which somehow seemed very appropriate. There’s nothing to dislike and it engenders a nice, warm feeling but that’s about it. However, credit should be given to Boris Gruzin who seemed to find exactly the right tempii for the dancers’ needs. This was a sad day, in which a gradually fading light was finally extinguished, but – if we believe in these things as most people who love the ballet surely must – the day turned to night with one new star burning brightly on the Covent Garden stage and another new star twinkling somewhere in Paradise. Graham Watts
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Michael LL
|
03-12-04, 02:13 PM (BST) |
|
2. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella - 2 December 2004"
In response to message #1
| |
Absolutely right Graham I thought Alina Cojocaru was perfect in every way as Cinderella; her performance has developed so much since the first night, and every movement and gesture was just right. Both she and Kobborg were radiant and seemed utterly entranced with each other while dancing the pas de deux. A superb performance, and much is due to the sensitive conducting of Boris Grusin. Indeed a worthy tribute from the modern generation to the first star of the Royal Ballet. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Anjuli_Bai
|
03-12-04, 02:47 PM (BST) |
 |
3. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella - 2 December 2004"
In response to message #2
| |
A wonderful review, Graham, thank you! I did enjoy reading especially your take on the sisters and their antics. In several productions that I have seen, the sisters literally overwhelm the rest of the dancers and underwhelm the audience - well, at least me, for one. It's a tentative line. A tape I have of Ashton and MacMillan with Fonteyn and Somes, seems to hit it about right. I think the fault I find with this ballet in general is that the two protagonists have precious little dancing to do. Well, perhaps, it is just that I want more for them to do. I see much of what the sisters do as "filler" material, taking up time (often much too much of it) long past establishing their characters. Another problem for me is the father. He is either played as a tyrant who allows Cinderella to be mistreated, or he is a total weakling - to the same effect. Or he is non-existant. In any case, it is an unsatisfactory role. Having seen Alina this past summer, I can well imagine that she would be wonderful in this role and your terrific review allowed me to see through your eyes, that she did indeed triumph. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Joanne
|
03-12-04, 05:07 PM (BST) |
 |
4. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella - 2 December 2004"
In response to message #3
| |
LAST EDITED ON 03-12-04 AT 05:11 PM (GMT) A great review of a wonderful evening Graham - I agree with you and Michael that Cojocaru and Kobborg were outstanding. The shere joy with which they danced throughout was infectious. I have always been moved by their dramatic roles, particularly in the MacMillan ballets and especially Giselle - tonight it as wonderful to see them in three acts of such a gentle, happy ballet. I too thought the 'supportng' cast looked magnificent. Vanessa Palmer was so fine as the Godmother - I just wish she had been given the credit. I can't, and won't try to, pick between the men, they were all so good. But, at the risk of being invidious I will say that, while I really enjoyed the Spring and Winter variations (I thought Nunez was trying to look frosty!), Summer and Autumn were extraordinary. I've greatly admired Lauren Cuthbertson in several roles, such as Agon, Symph in C and R&J. But there's always been this slight qualification of 'given how young/inexperienced she is'. Last night I thought she commanded Summer completely. Any series of double priouettes must, I imagine, test the technique and nerve - but the slow, almost langurous way she performed them must be doubly difficult. In them and her general demeanour she evoked the hot, lazy, sun-drenched days of summer so perfectly. In contrast, Laura Morera blew across the stage in the most tempestous Autumn I can rememer. Her version of the double pirouttes were rapid, off-balance and on the edge. With her multi-layered and jagged cut skirt whirling around her, she resembled one of those vortexes of leaves that make autumnal walks so distinctive. If I hadn't already marvelled at her Tatiana I would wonder where she had blown in from! Finally, the only part I'm not sure I entirely agree with you about Graham, is the Ugly Sisters. They are certainly different to Helpmann/Ashton - but I still enjoyed them greatly, as did at least one child (at least I think it was a child!) giggling nearby. Perhaps they do scene-steal a bit, but when they're trying to steal it from a cast like last night's, it's all they can do to be noticed! And their curtain calls - which were definitley 'in character' - were irreverant but great fun. Even the much denigrated 'suitors', whacky as they are, couldn't persuade me not to look at Cinderella, her Prince and the Fairies when they were onstage. And I did think Napoleon's rescuing of his toupe (which surely must have been unrehearsed?) spoke volumes for the spirit of the night. Overall, there was one moment that summed the night up for me. In the second act pdd the Prince smiled for his new found love, and it seemed to be just that, a smile for her alone, it really touched me. I can't wait for them in Fille. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
GW
|
03-12-04, 11:12 PM (BST) |
|
6. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella - 2 December 2004"
In response to message #1
| |
First of all, thanks for such generous comments.Secondly, Joanne, I do agree with you about Lauren and Laura and your description of them as Summer and Autumn is just perfect. I also very much liked Lauren's interpretation of Winter in the DR which may account for a slight disappointment with Marianela's performance - I agree that she was being frosty but it just seemed to be a very flat interpretation. Also, I don't want to be Scroogish about the Sisters - I appreciate that this is a pantomime/ballet and it was obvious that most people enjoyed their antics but I suspect that they would get even more laughs if they had started to throw custard pies at each other and so on! There has to be a dividing line and I think that they step over it ..... a few times! Having said that, I would also add that if a few hundred people come to see them and enjoy ballet as a result then it is worthwhile - so long as they don't think that ballet is always like that! Finally, I usually check all my references and sources before posting because my memory gets worse as the years roll by (!) - on this occasion, I realise that I have forgotten to count since this is clearly the FOURTH part of the Ashton 100 celebrations! Since I have seen each bill at least three times I can have no excuse for omitting one of them! Graham |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
annamicro
|
06-12-04, 01:48 PM (BST) |
|
16. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella - 2 December 2004"
In response to message #8
| |
>I was also struck by the assurance with which she >negotiated that apparently simple but tricky moment in act 3 >when she performs a supported developpe a la seconde (left >leg extended). Her partner then leaves her to balance while >he moves to her right side to take her hand and she then >turns into arabesque to face him. I have seen many more >experienced and celebrated dancers come to grief and off >pointe at this momentThank you for having pointed out that: I was shocked by Alina’s easiness, calm and simplicity in that very difficult movement, that seemed to last an eternity...and we have also to consider how high were her developpe and her sparkling arabasque! I have it still in my eyes: a true gem in an absolutely wonderful performance. Anna |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
DaveM
|
04-12-04, 11:46 PM (BST) |
 |
9. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella + 'dream team'"
In response to message #0
| |
just home from Leanne Benjamin's Cinderella, what a joy! Beautiful costumes (except the step sister's of course, who were enjoyably funny). Lovely sets too - if a bit noisy being hoisted about. And the ending was simply the proper fairy-tale ending, all glitter and happy ever afters. Lovely! Leanne can certainly whip around the stage at speed, a wee bundle of dynamic energy. And to these eyes, very endearing dancing too. But what made it for me, was the 'dream team' as the Season Fairies. There was Iohna Loots as Spring; Lauren Cuthbertson as Summer; Deidre Chapman as Autumn, and the divine Sarah Lamb as Winter. The latter looked particularly scrumptious. And Caroline Duprot was one of the other fairies in the corp - so all 5 of my 'dancers that caught my eye' were on stage at the same time! You can imagine how pleased I was - but then I had trouble knowing who to watch... Lauren had a particulalrly busy day today actually, as she and Edward Watson were doing the Ballet Insight Day in the Linbury in the afternoon, demonstrating a variety of techniques, from true classicism, through to modern stuff by wheeldon (who still maintains the use of classic ballet steps in his choreography). For interest - she did a solo from La Bayadere (sp?), followed by Ed doing the dance competition solo from Daphnis and Chloe. They then reprised their stunning pdd from R&J (bedroom scene), ending with one and a half run throughs of a pdd from Wheeldon's Polyphonia. This must have been particulalrly nerve racking, as wheldon himself was there to discuss the choreographer's role once they'd finished! A very interesting day, for the likes of us newbies.
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
lbeard
|
05-12-04, 08:49 PM (BST) |
|
12. "RE: Insight day"
In response to message #11
| |
Mandy, I went and loved it - will tell you all about it on Sunday next. I also took copious notes so I might consider posting something when I get my confidence back. Hope you enjoyed your holiday. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
yumi
|
11-12-04, 06:16 AM (BST) |
|
32. "RE: other casts"
In response to message #30
| |
>Jester was Paul Kay - was this his debut? If so, I am pleased to hear Paul got a big role!! Yumi |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Bruce
|
07-12-04, 02:52 PM (BST) |
 |
21. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #0
| |
RB Cinderella 2 December 2004In Short A Christmas winner for the family with a sensible story and not a nutcracker in sight. Fairies abound, Cinderella gets her man, gorgeous music and ugly sisters to please the dotty Gran in us all. A shame about the uninspiring design. Background A work that has been wooing people since 1948 and from a wonderfully prolific period of Frederick Ashton's - Symphonic Variations and Scenes de Ballet, his great masterworks, both date from this time. This is Prokofiev's finest ballet score too, if composed in the depths of the war it's full of vitality. Design David Walker's much-loved and delicate designs were replaced last season by rather less tasteful versions from Toer van Schayk (sets) and Christine Haworth (costumes). A year on and they still jar - if David Walker was Farrow and Ball then the new designs are B&Q. That said I do think the ball-gown designs for the Ugly Sisters have an appropriate ill-judged look and the ballroom set itself is wonderfully three-dimensional. But the fairies (normal and seasonal) make me shudder with their 'My Little Pony' colourways. Choreography Ashton's first full-length work and a good piece particularly in its movement for the fairies. The corps is rarely given such inventive and distinguished work and it must have been a revelation when first unveiled. The Seasons' variations, short and challenging, also enthrall with their diversity and the charm of their children-attendants. However the piece takes a fair while to get into its stride and we have to endure the Ugly Sisters' squabble over the scarf. I've never seen any partnership rise above the "two blokes desperately trying and failing miserably" feeling. It's not the dancers' fault - what Ashton asks for is beyond anyone who doesn't have six clear months to rehearse. Dancers Wayne Sleep and Anthony Dowell were the opening night Ugly Sisters and their characters have developed a lot since their debuts last season - for the better in my book. Sleep knows how to entertain and his comic additions please people if I suspect Ashton lovers of taste and discrimination will want little of such common vulgarity. For myself I welcome the injection of panto, given I think Ashton's Ugly Sisters choreography doesn't work for itself. Alina Cojocaru was Cinderella and for the first time she actually "got to me" as a principal rather than as a young and incredibly talented dancer. Here was poise, assurance, control and strong acting. Quite wonderful to behold and with a strong Prince in Kobborg. The Fairy Seasons all looked well-cast if Winter seemed rather grumpy about life. Does it Work? Yes - a pleasant coupling of panto and serious hi-art. But it would be better in the old designs. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Michael LL
|
08-12-04, 02:05 AM (BST) |
|
22. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #21
| |
I seem to recall that the designs for the last production were also critically derided when new, especially Act II which was very pink indeed. The design for the 1965 production, as on the Sibley and Dowell DVD, seemed better and more subtle. On this revival there are a few costume changes, notably a much better one for the Ashton sister in Act I, and the orangey glow seemed to have been toned down in the last scene. The first scene still looks too empty, and I'm not sure what they can do there. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
lbeard
|
08-12-04, 11:51 AM (BST) |
|
25. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #24
| |
..is it still the case >that the version we saw or the music we hear first has too >be best?... Hard to say. I saw it first so long ago that I can't remember either cast or production (don't think it was the RB's) but I have always loved the music which I know from recordings. I have now seen the current production in rehearsal and I have the DVD of the Dowell-Sibley version. To be honest I don't see huge differences between the two and I don't dislike the design of either - they both seem a little subdued except for the sisters' costumes. I'm hoping to see it again on Friday with (Rojo-Cope). Has Tamara danced Cinders before? How different is her interpretation?
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
JohnM
|
09-12-04, 02:22 AM (BST) |
 |
29. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #27
| |
> the Cinderella Sibley/Dowell recording is well worth getting hold of I agree. Dowell in his prime is wonderful to behold: the heavenly twins indeed. A few differences from the current version. Cinderella's entry in Act II is handled differently: there are more stairs and she's only on pointe for the last three. The choreography of the midnight scene looks different and the change from ballerina to raggedy is more cleverly done now. Also the linking scene at the beginning of Act III isn't there in this 1964 version. Pity that the image quality (even on DVD) isn't too good. It's about time for a new one. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
DaveM
|
13-12-04, 10:01 AM (BST) |
 |
33. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #27
| |
>Linda, Tamara has danced Cinderella before. Dave, the >Cinderella Sibley/Dowell recording is well worth getting >hold of! ebay here i come! :¬) Oh - and Tamara was FABULOUS as Cinderella. Quite understandable that the Prince fell in love with her at first sight!!!
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Paul A
|
16-12-04, 08:52 AM (BST) |
|
34. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #31
| |
The performance on the 15th was my first viewing of this production -and my first return visit since a captivating performance in 1997 with Belinda Hatley. The experience was weird - particularly coming so soon after Sylvia. That work and the company's performance of it really revealed the felicities of Ashton. Cinderella in this performance looked the inferior work - the production and designs really cheapen the piece. I was no fan of the David Walker designs but that production had more magic. There seemed to be an unease with the performances - the stars and friends a shade out of synch, though seeing this from stalls circle doesn't help - the stars formations looked a bit lumpy - above is better. Weird too that the first scene didn't drag - maybe the bright lighting helped. Thought Dowell and Sleep had gone a long way to finding some character for the sisters. Maybe in another 10 years they will have something in their own right. Sleep's is the more incomplete performance. (Their performances provoked some strong laughter around me - amongst obviously not knowledgeable ballet goers). Christopher Saunders as the father did not register at all. Don't think the seasons really got it - rather a smugged impression. Salerno as spring looked to have a very stiff back though she got most applause. Nunez still looked grumpy as winter. Confused by the cast change for the other two so won't comment. (As contrast - the 1997 reviews said the seasons were as well danced as can expect these days but was very impresses then by Gallie, Valtat, Roberts, Yanowsky. They seemed to have more fizz and energy). Thought Rojo did very nicley with the broom and the mood of this scene - but otherwise I was disappointed. Her coach departure and arrival at the ball went for little (is it the designs?) - and though strong her circling of the ballroom seemed to lack wonder - maybe just technically too strong. Cope looked pretty interested in proceedings - good elevation in act two. Liked Jose martin as the jester - technically very good and thought a real wistfulness came over which surprised me given the comments last year. Good to have an impromptu meeting with others by the piano - will enjoy hearing the diversity of impressions. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
ian_palmer
|
16-12-04, 10:15 AM (BST) |
 |
35. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #34
| |
I must confess to you all, and I know that I will probably be shunned from certain quarters for saying it, but I have never been Jonathan Cope's biggest fan. Last night, however, I saw the sparkle that makes hims so beloved by many. With Rojo he seems to have that extra finesse, almost a lovingness, and his partnering is immaculate and very caring. There were many technical accomplishments to Rojo's performance, not least the near perfect execution of the Act 3 wizzardry desribed by Wulff above. But like Paul, I felt there was something still lacking in completeness. The cast changes were not too complex - Lauren Cuthbertson was out and replaced as Summer by a radiant Sarah Lamb. She, in turn, was replaced by Marianella Nunez as Fairy Winter. She certainly looked frosty, which is as I would have imagined Winter to be, but she also looked uncomfortable. She did, though, finally get to dance with Thiago Soares, who even in the smallest role of a friend of the Prince exudes style elegance and allure in all that he does - and just watch his arms! Dowell's Sister is much more finely tuned than last year, and quite funny. Sleep remains irritating. But that doesn't really matter because this ballet is stuffed with such glorious cameos that you can take your mind off it all. Especially when you have such a brilliant Dancing Master as Joshua Tuifua (am I beginning to sound a bit Josh Tuifua mad?) who in my opinion, very nearly stole Act 1. It was also lovely to have an impromptu "Get-Together" by the piano - I should definitely wear that bandana more often! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Ian Graham
|
16-12-04, 01:32 PM (BST) |
 |
36. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #35
| |
I saw Rojo/Cope last weekend and enjoyed the performance very much. I thought she, particularly, was excellent: petite and vulnerable but also technically dazzling when required. I was also very impressed with Cope: still so slim and fit - an inspiration for we other over-40s! I had read a lot of criticism of Dowell and Sleep but I really enjoyed their performances. I think a bit of 'broad' humour is not out of place in this ballet at all and they carried it off with great panache. The rest of the cast demonstrated the enormous strength in depth at the Royal Ballet (Soares and Watson as 'friends of the prince!). I was particularly taken with Jose Martin's athletic jester and (as Ian Palmer has reported) Joshua Tuifua's gorgeous dancing master. After his excellent Eros in "Sylvia", Tuifua has become for me a dancer to watch out for. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
spooky
|
18-12-04, 00:18 AM (BST) |
|
38. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #35
| |
Ian you have summed up most of my feelings about this performance and thank you for enlightening me to the identity of the suitor in the silver jacket (Thiago Soares). Watching the suitors dance reminded me of the thread about 'dancers who cathch the eye' I just found myself continually drawn to Thiago despite all my efforts to look at the other dancers. Initially I was a little disappointed with Tamara Rojo. She just didn't move me in the same way as when I saw her in the role last year but as soon as she started dancing with Cope I realised that the problem was actually in the relationship between Cinderella and her father. These scenes had particually touched me previously but can't remember who was the father then. I was looking forward to seeing Sarah Lamb dance Fairy Winter after reading reviews here but thought she made a nice job of Summer - I could almost feel the sun's heat. I also still found Sleep's sister very anoying - possibly even more so than last year but was pleasently suprised by Dowell's which I felt had almost reached a comfortable pitch. Finally I was also very impressed by Jose Martin's jester. His interaction with the rest of the dancers was outstanding and he really seemed to be an essential part of the whole performance rather than an isolated dancer. This is the first time I have posted comments on a performance as I do not get to watch very many and so do not therefore feel very qualified to make judgements, but I was so suprised by my own reactions to the performance (the dancers who I enjoyed most were very different to those that I had assumed I would be watching closely based on previous performances and comments read here) I thought I would make a few personal observations. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Amadeus_14
|
17-12-04, 11:56 PM (BST) |
|
37. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #34
| |
(Their performances provoked some strong laughter around me - amongst obviously not knowledgeable ballet goers). Hi Paul...please can you explain the above sentence?...what's wrong with laughing?........do we have to watch in silence and only applaud in appropriate places? I was at the same performance as you.. my very first visit to ROH also sitting in stalls circle... obvoiusly as my first visit I found the evening enchanting... the dancing executed perfectly by Cope and Rojo ,the jester exciting..however the icing on the cake for me was Dowell in particular...The part is larger than life and both sisters are the clay feet of the piece, bringing into it a down to earth quality..........Dowell was funny, brilliant,with great timing and great stage presence...........I thought he knocked everyone else into a cocked hat !!... Lighten up,relax, "hang loose" (as they say in Hawaii) KayTee |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Paul A
|
20-12-04, 07:26 AM (BST) |
|
40. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #37
| |
>(Their performances provoked some strong laughter around me >- amongst obviously not knowledgeable ballet goers). > >Hi Paul...please can you explain the above >sentence?...what's wrong with laughing?........do we have to >watch in silence and only applaud in appropriate places? Merely it was a surprise to hear laughter - given the many comments over many years that the step sisters do not provoke any humour.
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Amadeus_14
|
20-12-04, 12:47 PM (BST) |
|
41. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #40
| |
Great !!! glad the sisters made us laugh !!! thought perhaps we might be breaking ballet goers etiquette by doing so. Mele Kalikimaka and Hau'oli Makahiki Hou to everyone. KayTee |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Paul A
|
20-12-04, 03:15 PM (BST) |
|
42. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #41
| |
>Great !!! glad the sisters made us laugh !!! thought perhaps >we might be breaking ballet goers etiquette by doing so. Oh gosh no.
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Joanne
|
21-12-04, 02:02 AM (BST) |
 |
44. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #43
| |
We've just returned from a second viewing of Cinderella, this time with Marquez & Putrov. I thought she was delightful, and given it was her debut in the role, she already seemed to have a good grasp of many of the nuances. There were some occasions when I found her acting a little emphatic, as if she felt she wasn’t projecting to the amphi, and the second act solo may have taxed her stamina, but as she settles into the piece I can see her mellowing into a really beautiful heroine; for me she already has all the charm, warmth and crispness of technique that is needed. After some comments post the rehearsal I am delighted to say that Putrov was an attentive partner and a lovestruck prince, with a real panache in his solos. If there wasn't quite the rapport that I saw between Cojocaru and Kobborg that is no criticism of tonight's couple but a testament to how stunning the established partnership is. I seem to be in a minority of one about the production and designs. I liked the previous one enormously, but I also like the current one much more than many posters and critics do. I wouldn't rave about them, but they certainly don't detract from the ballet for me and some aspects I positively like. I don’t find the courtiers costumes or the ballroom in the second act more jarring in colour than the multicoloured confections of Sylvia's third act.... but then I'm out on a limb about that too!! Overall I find the ballet such a happy and funny (yes, I laughed at the sisters again) evening, with such wonderful choreography and gorgeous music, that I love watching it.As a PS, for the first time that I can remember, the main curtain misbehaved at the calls. While there was obviously some concern amongst the dancers, the grace and professionalism with which they handled it was terrific and I applaud them and the stage crew for saving the end of evening.
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Michael LL
|
21-12-04, 01:26 PM (BST) |
|
48. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #47
| |
Marquez and Putrov were indeed excellent, imbuing a lovely spirit of old fashioned romance and charm. I don't think they were superior to either Rojo and Cope, or especially the extraordinary first night performances of Cojocaru and Kobborg. Marriot and Howells were quite delightfully dotty as the Sisters, and much less grotesque than Dowell and Sleep. With the curtain problem there was inevitably a little confusion. However Marquez and Putrov did come alone to the footlights for a solo bow, and she left her bouquet there. I suspect there might have been more solo bows, but the applause stopped very suddenly as the dancers were seen leaving the stage in the dark, and the house lights came up. In the "old days" we were perhaps more insistent, and it was almost de rigeur for the principals to have at least one call with the house lights up. Applause is not what it was! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Elise
|
07-01-05, 03:58 PM (BST) |
|
54. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #53
| |
Linda, Hope this helps : Cinderella Darcey Bussell The Prince Jonathan Cope Cinderella’s Step-Sisters Alastair Marriott, Philip Mosley Cinderella’s Father William Tuckett The Fairy Godmother Vanessa Palmer ACT I Scene 1 Old Beggar Woman James Wilkie The Dancing Master Jonathan Howells Two Fiddlers Mark Greensill, David Hanesworth A Tailor Johannes Stepanek Dressmakers Vanessa Fenton, Francesca Filpi The Shoemaker Michael Stojko The Hairdresser Joshua Tuifua A Jeweller Kenta Kura The Coachman Erico Montes ACT I Scene 2 The Fairy Spring Christina Salerno The Fairy Summer Gillian Revie The Fairy Autumn Laura Morera The Fairy Winter Sarah Lamb ACT II The Jester Jose Martin The Prince’s Friends Gary Avis, Bennet Gartside, Martin Harvey, Edward Watson Suitors Ludovic Ondiviela, Rupert Pennefather ACT III The Entire Cast
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
lbeard
|
07-01-05, 07:39 PM (BST) |
|
56. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #55
| |
>Was this the casting for the 31st? > >If so I'm sure that Gillian Revie was The Fairy Godmother >and Joshua Tuifua was the dancing master at that show. There >was an announcement at the start about changes and Joshua >was one of the announced ones but Gillian Revie was in the >cast sheet as Fairy Godmother. Thank you both, Elise and Shirley, for putting up all the cast details for me - it's very kind of you. Just one thing - if Gillian Revie was the Fairy Godmother, who danced the Summer fairy? And was the substitution due to injury or illness? Whoever dances on the 14th, though, the scheduled lineup looks terrific - particularly the Prince's friends. I'm really looking forward to it. Any comments on performances? How was Darcey, for instance? Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Elise
|
07-01-05, 08:50 PM (BST) |
|
57. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #56
| |
LAST EDITED ON 07-01-05 AT 09:04 PM (GMT) Linda and Shirley,My apologies, I should have made it clear in my post that this casting is for the 14th Jan as Linda requested. The casting looks absolutely first rate. My only question would be - when will Acosta ever be offered this role ? I'd love to see what he would make of the pas de deux in particular. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Elise
|
08-01-05, 11:22 AM (BST) |
|
59. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella"
In response to message #58
| |
I very much hope that's the case Becca, and that they have offered it to him. It does seem unlikely that he'd refuse a new challenge as a dancer, don't you think ? |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Elise
|
08-01-05, 01:01 PM (BST) |
|
61. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella - Carlos Acosta"
In response to message #60
| |
LAST EDITED ON 08-01-05 AT 01:16 PM (GMT) Let's hope you're right Becca. And if that's not the case, then maybe he'll get the opportunity soon.I think this is a "heads above the parapet moment" in a way, so will anyone else agree with Becca and I, saying that if Acosta was offered, and accepted, the principal role in Cinders, we'd really love to see what he'd make of it ? |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
DaveM
|
08-01-05, 11:25 PM (BST) |
 |
66. "RE: Royal Ballet Cinderella - Carlos Acosta"
In response to message #62
| |
>It would indeed have been good to see Acosta as the Prince, >as would it also have been good to see Thiago Soares. At >least though they have other things to do in other large >works. > >But their absence is of nothing when compared to the >disgraceful absence of Mara Galeazzi from all three-act >ballets this season. Why is she being treated like this >after her wonderful 2003/04 season? Isn't she doing lots of side projects at the mo? Don't ask me exactly what, but I vaguely remember hearing somewhere she was doing lots of new contempory stuff, and guesting and suchlike. Though don't quote me on it. Though wasn't she Diana in some of the Sylvia performances? As for Acosta - he'd be brillaint in ANYTHING! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
alison
|
12-01-05, 01:27 PM (BST) |
 |
72. "Disappointments ... and gripes"
In response to message #0
| |
It seems that by going later in the run I've missed out on some of the best performances from the supporting casts. I was very sorry to miss: Hatley's Fairy Godmother Morera's Autumn Fairy Cuthbertson's Summer Fairy The first-cast Prince's Friends and probably a few others who don't spring to mind right now. Oh well, at least I saw both fairies last time around ... BTW, one thing that irritates me above all about this production (and I've been particularly aware of it this season, being stuck in the amphitheatre, is the really annoying lighting effects. Do we *really* need the "this is magic" lighting patterns swirling around the ceiling? Do we not have ears? Do we not hear that Prokofiev's music is already doing an excellent job of telling us that magic is in the air? (And they manage to blind various members of the audience, as well! Those of you downstairs don't know how lucky you are ). Plus there's the effect swirling across the spangly curtain in the house > garden transformation - what on earth is that supposed to be? It just looks a mess. RB, please get rid of both next time around!
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Lynette H
|
13-01-05, 05:36 PM (BST) |
 |
76. "RE: The jester"
In response to message #75
| |
Is it me, or was it usual in the past to cast the jester at principal level ? I'm sure I can recall Erroll Pickford and quite possibly Kumakawa doing the role. It's quite testing technically, and it ought to be a test of putting a real chracter across as well - something that seems to have entirely gone out of the window now. I'm not sure that this is the same issue as the difference in casting levels now, but it might be. I saw Ciriaci (a soloist) as the jester on Weds 12th and I think Stojko (First Artist) in an earlier cast. While it is good to give the younger members of the company have a chance at a major role, there seems a trend with this particular role to have more permanently downgraded it in some way. Or is it me ? Memories of interesting jesters, please...
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
AEHandley
|
15-01-05, 10:41 AM (BST) |
|
79. "RE: The jester"
In response to message #78
| |
Quick note on last night's performance - the house was very subdued I felt, not a lot of excitement in the air. Darcey was lovely - this is a role that suits her, and she seems thinner to me, which works well for the "rags" scenes. Vanessa Palmer exuded goodness as the fairy godmother and executed the most exquisite bourrees I have seen (although her right shoe looked less than perfect - I saw a sickled effect in arabesque which I'm sure must have been a skewed shoe not her foot) together with a perfectly Ashtonian upper body. Christina Elida Salerno looked far more at ease as the Spring fairy than she did last year. Gillian Revie used her arms beautifully as Summer but didn't quite reach the languidity that I saw last year from Lauren Cuthbertson. Laura Morera I found a bit disappointing as Autumn - she wasn't as dazzlingly fast as I felt she could have been and I remember her being stunning last year. Sarah Lamb didn't make a big impression on me as Winter - Zenaida last year was far better but then we had the problem of her being a foot taller than the other fairies and the whole look being spoiled. Marriott and Mosley as the sisters were excellent - not a hint of overplaying. However, I rather missed Dowell's monstrously self-confident sister. Reading other comments here about the jester I'm really not sure what people were looking for there. Jose Martin danced it very well and IMO had the right "outsider who knows more than the rest" presence. William Tuckett didn't project quite enough for me as the father, but that could be the role as much as him. Ashamed to say I only recognised Watson among the Prince's friends - I THINK I worked out who Soares was but could have done with photos for the rest. Dancing fine here but nothing to make me say "wow". Jonny performed immaculately as the Prince (although the soppy grin got a bit irritating) - no sign of readiness for retirement. My only real gripe was about the stars, who looked very scrappy at their first appearance, and really looked barely out of school. The guests at the ball danced far better. A perfectly enjoyable performance, but nothing to set the Thames on fire for me. It was great to see so many ballet.co-ers, though! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Elise
|
15-01-05, 11:06 AM (BST) |
|
80. "Cinders last night"
In response to message #79
| |
Soares was Fairy Winter's Cavalier. All the Princes Friends were excellent last night and I liked the fairy line-up, though I missed Lauren Cuthbertson as Summer. As AEHandley says, the audience was perfectly hushed last night - and there were plenty of youngish children. All of the noise was coming from the stage last night - some of the scenery changes were very loud. Jose Martin was even better than last year as the Jester - he really has the audience in his grip from the moment the curtain goes back. And he gets the best costume. The Stars didn't shine for me as much as they did last year, but it was good to see Vanessa Palmer as the Fairy Godmother, who really seemed to own the part. As in the earlier post, I thought her bourrees were the best I've seen, really beautiful. Darcey Bussell did her best with the role, though I don't think it's suited to her. Although her reading is very different from others I've seen, she's great to watch, though the odd wobble was there. Cope isn't my idea of a Prince, and the inane grin is wearing after a while. I prefer Cobborg's softer reading with more subtle expressions. And what's with all the glitter and dust being scattered about by the Fairy Godmother and her entourage ? New for this run I think. It's just as well we're all different and that the RB have so many dancers to keep everyone happy ! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Joanne
|
15-01-05, 03:23 PM (BST) |
 |
82. "RE: Cinders last night"
In response to message #81
| |
Well,that's three of us who found the audience subdued last night. The applause was generous at the end but we didn't seem to be responding to the sisters at all at first. Perhaps people were expecting them to be more over the top? I thought Darcey Bussell was lovely last night and that the role suited her interpretation as well as others I saw. Some of her footwork during her solos, both with and without the broom, was stunning - and I'm someone who doesn't usually notice a particular part of any dancer, just their overall effect! I must have been on that wavelength last night, because I also wondered what had happend to Vanessa Palmer's foot in her arabesques - I'm so glad you solved that for me AEHandley. The fairies were fine - I didn't think Morera was as exceptional as the first time I saw her, but then I think that may have been one of those perfect nights when everything worked perfectly. If I hadn't seen that I would have thought yesterday pretty amazing. I enjoyed all the others too, though I also missed Cuthbertson's Summer, and the Princes friends were fine without being stunning (but I didn't have any problem spotting Soares ). I'm really just repeating what the others have said, which is pretty silly - so I'll just finish by wondering if we, the audience, put a slight damper on things? There wasn't the magic in the air that occured(sp) with Cojocaru/Kobborg and yet there wasn't that much wrong with it. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
wulff
|
16-01-05, 03:42 PM (BST) |
|
86. "RE: Cinders last night"
In response to message #82
| |
I was there too, and I didn't find the audience particularly unresponsive. Perhaps we are getting used to having a higher level of enthusiasm in the house (no bad thing) than there used to be. I was very impressed by Darcey Bussell's performance. I hadn't seen her dance the role for some time, and it seemed to me that she had added quite a lot more detail to her interpretation. Technically I thought she was in top form, beautiful line, precise footwork, and well controlled turns, both fast and slow. In fact, I often think that its almost worth the price of one's ticket just to see Darcey do slow turns in attitude. Other points I noticed were that she used her eyes very expressively (something that Ashton considered very important) and that in her second act variation where she poses for a moment in a retire position with her back to the audience and bends back and looks over her shoulder, she does this first to the right and then to the left, whereas most other dancers do it to the right only on both repetitions of this movement. Very surprisingly -- because I thought she was going to sail through it -- she came off pointe at that moment in Act3 which I have mentioned before, viz:developpe a la seconde supported by partner on her left, then holding the position unsupported before turning in arabesque to take her partners hand on her right. But I suppose the perfect performance is rarely if ever achieved, at least to the dancer's satisfaction. Oh, and by the way, I thought the pdd was pretty stunning too! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Elise
|
16-01-05, 03:55 PM (BST) |
|
87. "RE: Cinders last night"
In response to message #86
| |
Wulff, I had a dancer friend with me on Friday night who thought that the moment when Bussell came off pointe was in fact due to her partner, Cope, not being in the right place to support her. I don't know the in's and out's of it but it's rare for Bussell and I bet she was mad with herself whatever the cause. Still, if anyone saw Don Q at the RFH last night, two of the dancers decked it - something I've never seen in a performance of the Royal Ballet. They recovered well enough though. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Elise
|
17-01-05, 02:41 PM (BST) |
|
95. "RE: Cinders last night"
In response to message #94
| |
Well quite, and with a partner such as Acosta who wouldn't be willing to take risks ? It's a fascinating subject in itself - how partnerships work on stage. When Rojo held her balance for ever but started wobbling slightly towards the end, I wondered how they had planned it and how Acosta would know when she'd had enough ? I guess it's all in the music but she seemed to stretch it to eternity ! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
ami
|
17-01-05, 03:24 PM (BST) |
 |
99. "RE: Cinders last night"
In response to message #98
| |
Very interesting comment Tony - I actually thought that what Carlos 'One-Handed Lift Man' Acosta was best at (in terms of partnering and of course, beyond just one-handed lifts) is his support of pirouettes - he knows when just to guide with his hands, when he needs to straighten, and when to get a few more turns out of a good pirouette. His one-handed supported pirouette of Tamara was amazing. As far as the balance thing - when was Carlos to come back? Well, first, I didn't notice any wobbling, or signaling - I think with good partnerships, to some extent, you just *know*.... And was I the only one who was so warmly touched by Carlos's wide grin - so proud of her was he! Perhaps we should start a new thread about aspects of partnering? |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Elise
|
17-01-05, 03:50 PM (BST) |
|
100. "RE: Cinders last night"
In response to message #99
| |
No you weren't Ami - I think that grin IS Carlos. His partner's must feel a million dollars dancing with him. You've only got to watch his own show to see how generous he is with the choreography. Sure, he can do all the tricks but he'll make sure everyone else has a chance too. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
lbeard
|
16-01-05, 04:35 PM (BST) |
|
88. "RE: Cinders last night"
In response to message #86
| |
she came off pointe at that moment in Act3 >which I have mentioned before, viz:developpe a la seconde >supported by partner on her left, then holding the position >unsupported before turning in arabesque to take her partners >hand on her right. I was there and I noticed it too (so did my Mum and neither of us are experts) but it was only a tiny flaw in an otherwise sublime performance. And I doubt if it was her partner's fault - Cope is usually very reliable in this respect and there were no hitches in his pdds with Tamara Rojo. I thought the first scene was received a little more quietly than at other performances but possibly this was because the Sisters gave a much more subtle performance - less slapstick than other casts and all the better for it. Of the rest of the cast I really enjoyed all the performances but Jose Martin stood out as the Jester - most impressive. In my Mum's words ' a magical evening!'
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be
directed to
Bruce Marriott
|
|